« 'Less is more' - What Mies van der Rohe and Sophie Dahl have in common | Home | 'Kenneth, what's the frequency?' - Secret plastic codes revealed »
December 10, 2004
BehindTheMedspeak: Habib Sealer

New in cancer surgery is the "Habib Sealer," named after its inventor, Dr. Nagy Habib, head of liver surgery at London's Hammersmith Hospital.
Habib's invention is a hand-held radio wave generator which "cooks" tissue around liver tumors.
After using the device, surgeons can proceed to remove liver tumors without the risk of profuse bleeding that normally accompanies liver surgery.
Habib says the device not only eliminates the need for blood transfusions during the surgery, but reduces the average hospital stay after such surgery from 15 to 8 days.
The sealer has also been used for kidney and spleen surgery, and Habib hopes to extend it to the pancreas, uterus, and lungs.
The FDA is expected to approve it for US use in February of next year.
Here's the reason this item made it into bookofjoe: it costs only £600 ($1,150).
I thought to myself, can't be.
Medical devices, expecially original ones, cost many thousands or tens of thousands of dollars, at least in the U.S.
I mean, Boston Scientific charges $5,000 apiece for its tiny drug-coated stents.
But wait, there's more.
Habib believes mass production could make his invention much cheaper, and that it could sell for as little as £5 ($9.50) in developing countries.
Habib said in today's Financial Times story, "All they will have to buy is a simple hand-held device, which does not need any expensive additional equipment."
Amazing and wonderful.
[via Clive Cookson and The Financial Times]
December 10, 2004 at 01:01 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef00d8346dc35e69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BehindTheMedspeak: Habib Sealer:
Comments
where , how , when can we order this promising device ?
Posted by: henriet | Jan 26, 2005 1:18:23 PM
I can't say enough how I appreciate people who make strides like this. This man is making a device he could make a bunch of money on and selling it cheap. And then the part about 'eliminates the need for blood transfusions during the surgery'. I personally don't think I will ever take a blood transfusion. There is so many things wrong with a blood transfusion. Humans are dirtier animals than pigs are. And now days there are so many things that can be done to eleviate or eliminate the need for one. Here is another one.
Posted by: kurt | Dec 11, 2004 7:40:36 PM
Hi Joe! I discovered your excellent site during version one and have continued to follow it daily. I'm a fairly recent medical graduate, considering specializing in Ophthalmology or Radiology. My comment is I think you mean "WITHOUT the risk of profuse bleeding" in the third line of this entry.
Thats all. Thanks.
Posted by: Terrence L. Cham | Dec 10, 2004 6:17:25 PM