« World's most stylish iBook? | Home | Suction Digital Thermometer »

February 02, 2005

What's your I[CT]Q?

Splash_logo

The Educational Testing Service (ETS), the very same people who bring us the SAT, GRE, and other scourges of educational existence, has taken a page from Steve Jobs' book iPod Shuffle book.

Out of nowhere - not even whole cloth - they've created a need, and they know just how to fill it.

Now available, at a testing center near you - in fact, it was just released last week - is the new Information and Communications Technology Test (ICT).

Basically, it's to see if you can use a computer.

All tricked-out, no doubt, with the usual Type K questions and suchlike.

It's meant to be used, at least initially, by colleges, who are supposed to give the Web-based exam in classrooms or instruction labs, with students logging on with access codes purchased by their schools.

The test costs colleges $25 a student, discounted to $20 if they sign up during the first testing period, which ends March 31.

Teresa Egan, the project manager, said in a January 17 New York Times article that "the test is fun."

Tom Zeller, Jr., who wrote the story, then asked her if she'd taken it.

"What a cruel question," Egan responded.

Yeah.

Here's the story.

February 2, 2005 at 09:01 AM | Permalink


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef00d8343b359953ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What's your I[CT]Q?:

Comments

Basically, it's just a test to see how many more tests the American public is willing to pay for. Could the bomb drop now please?

Posted by: ScienceChic | Feb 2, 2005 6:24:38 PM

Its not really a 'new' need.

As a researcher with a larger university dealing mainly in assessment and placement testing, we've struggled with this problem for years. Several years back, while developing an AI driven essay rater, we needed a way to measure computer knowledge and computer anxiety as a means to correlate back on these scores as well as analyze how well we were serving our customers by offering our testing almost entirely computer based formats (we did offer alternatives, but as they were technically different types of tests, they didn't offer exactly the same types of results and were as such a bit harder to categorize).

I don't know if I'd call this test 'fun' but it is a diversion from some of the more serious tests -- not that this isn't a serious test in itself (and personally, I think they do themselves a disservice by referring to this instrument so flippantly).

Now to see about getting this instrument installed in my lab -- it might be interesting to compare side by side with our homegrown ones.

Posted by: clif | Feb 2, 2005 10:04:10 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.