« crazy numbers watch | Home | Smencil »

January 22, 2006

Is the secret of happiness right in front of our eyes?

BvbvvnbvnbvBvbvvnbvnbv_1

David Colman's "Possessed" column in last Sunday's New York Times Styles section featured Daniel Gilbert, a professor of psychology at Harvard University, and his beloved cargo pants (above).

They're the only pants he buys, "five or 10 at a swipe... in different colors at Costco."

Gilbert told Colman, "The joys of variety are vastly overrated in every domain of pleasure."

Stipulated.

Gilbert's forthcoming book (in May, from Knopf) is entitled "Stumbling on Happiness."

Tell you what, he's gonna sell a lot of books: it was ranked #889 on Amazon earlier this week and it's still four months away from publication.

Anyway, read the article, which follows, and draw your own conclusions.

    Three Cheers for the Same Old Thing

    We like to think of ourselves as walking face forward into the future, eyes on the prize, a reasonable parallel to how we walk to work.

    But really, is that reasonable at all? In figurative terms we are more precisely walking backward into the future.

    After all, we can really see clearly only the past that is behind us and only guess at the road that lies ahead.

    Daniel Gilbert, a professor of psychology at Harvard, would like to outfit this metaphor with a side-view mirror, one reading: "Objects in future appear much larger than they are."

    A pioneer in the research of affective forecasting, Dr. Gilbert has illuminated a startling and fundamental mistake that both men and women make: they overestimate how future successes and failures will affect their happiness, for the better or worse.

    Not that people are easily disappointed by a promotion or apathetic about being fired.

    Rather, as Dr. Gilbert has found in charting his subjects' lives and reactions, "the good isn't as good, and the bad isn't as bad as we think it's going to be."

    A corollary finding is that a single big payoff - a fat raise, an Hermès Kelly bag, a hot cha cha date - affects people's essential happiness much less than a routine of small delights.

    And Dr. Gilbert, for one, is sold.

    He has found, for example, that one of the best things about being at Harvard is not the prestige of his position but that he can walk to work from his house in Cambridge.

    Much as you might embrace a chance to rebut the assertion that you would be happier with daily foot rubs for life than with $100 million, Dr. Gilbert, whose data is winningly compiled in "Stumbling On Happiness," due from Alfred A. Knopf in May, said his research clearly supported that message.

    But wouldn't you get bored?

    Wrong again.

    Dr. Gilbert's research also indicates that people who indulge in "false variety seeking" - that is, incessantly trying something new for variety's sake - are generally less happy than people who stick to their tried-and-true favorites.

    "The joys of variety are vastly overestimated in every domain of pleasure," he said.

    So as dull as you might think it, Dr. Gilbert's greatest luxury is an utter lack of fashion imagination.

    It is expressed neatly in a great big load of cargo pants, bought 5 or 10 at a swipe, size 35 by 30, in different colors at Costco.

    "My students all mock me," he said.

    "They think it's always the same pair."

    He is unruffled.

    "I never have to figure out what to wear," he said happily.

    "My life is full of decisions, and any time I can eliminate one, I feel that I have scored a victory."

    He added, "We haven't even begun to talk about the virtues of loose fit and big pockets."

    Is there a brand he prefers?

    He twisted around as far as he could.

    "Let me see," he said. "It says Union Bay."

    It probably does not shock too many people that money is not the answer.

    But with a steady drumbeat from self-help books telling us to embrace change, it is a relief to hear that there is much to be said for staying right where we are, in our happy little ruts.

    Change, and the future, will arrive whether we chase them down or not, so why not make the most of today?

    It might sound dull, but at least we know what to expect.

********************

I do believe that happiness directly aimed at will never be attained.

It seems always to be a side effect, a by–product of doing something else.

That said, finding that something else can be maddeningly elusive.

And that's an understatement.

January 22, 2006 at 04:01 PM | Permalink


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef00d834a38d6d69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is the secret of happiness right in front of our eyes?:

Comments

Walking to work a symptom of autism? New to me, although I bike to work, in different clothes that look different....but since I wear "floods," capri pants, pedal pushers, cropped pants... (so to not catch them in the oily chain) my students might think I am autistic.

Posted by: Mb | Jan 24, 2006 8:55:41 AM

It seems like looking for happiness is kind of like looking at the stars in the night sky (kind of hard in the day sky) - you have to look just to the side to see them. There's that, and the "it's better over there" thing. Plus, I think it's impossible to study happiness, period. Only after the fact. So many factors go into it, long-term and short-term. One thing is for damn sure: You can NOT make other people happy. You can throw stuff at their happiness spot but the experience of it is up to them. You might THINK this or that will make you happy, then the actual experience of this or that can be anything BUT happiness. (That's why gift-giving is such a minefield.)

I've had too many experiences of truly dreading some event, going anyway, and having the most wonderful experience. Or getting some silly little no-occasion present (the minefield) from someone and remembering it, treasuring it, forever. One-time things creating long-time happiness.

Sometimes things are a lot worse than I thought they'd be. How things are going to create a sense of happiness for me, short or long term, is something that I just can not pin down.

I don't think there is any secret. And if there is, it's right behind, not in front of, your eyes. Old Abe said people are about as happy as they make up their minds to be, and that's probably about as close as anybody can get to the truth.


Posted by: Flutist | Jan 22, 2006 9:31:04 PM

Don't take advice on happiness from those who have their lives in a headlock. Harvard professor? Walks to work? Dresses in the same clothes? Aren't these the symptoms of autism?

Thank goodness for the visionaries who dream big and have filled my home with electricity, running water, and the internet.

Posted by: David | Jan 22, 2006 6:35:28 PM

This seems to be on a similar thread to something I've been thinking about lately, but haven't quite figured out how to express yet. The best example I can give...

Why does your favorite song sound better on the radio when it pops up unexpectedly compared to when you get it out of its case and put it in the CD player? The surprise is part of what makes it sound better. And the affirmation that someone else somewhere liked it as much as you to play it on the radio.

I've always been an advocate of small pleasures too, but my point here is that sometimes the pleasures come from what we have no control over and that's what makes it even more pleasurable. (Like giving yourself a foot massage versus getting one from someone else.)

And just to get all economic theory on y'all, it's pretty hard not to be swayed by affective forecasting in a capitalist society. If we all stop believing that a Mercedes convertible, a video iPod, the newest gadgets and a two-story house in the suburbs will make us happy, what will happen to the world as we know it?

And, last but not least, the problem with affective forecasting, I believe, is that part of human nature is that the grass is always greener over there. And we're here now. We got here from there and we thought we wanted to be here. But now here is looking brown and weedy and there is looking utterly scrumptious. And we're not logical creatures, even though we think we are. We think there looks better because we've read the report and ran the numbers and four out of five cows agree.

OK, I've confused everyone enough. I'll shut up now. Back to the football game.

And they shouldn't call it forecasting either. I mean how often does the weatherman get it wrong? ;)

Posted by: Shawn Lea | Jan 22, 2006 6:20:21 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.