« Leather Fly Swatter | Home | Personal 50–Foot–Long Red Carpet »
February 27, 2006
BehindTheMedspeak: Does hunger make you smarter?
A new report by Sabrina Diano and her colleagues from the Yale University School of Medicine appears to answer this question with a resounding "yes."
Their paper was published online on February 19 in the journal Nature Neuroscience.
Melissa Lee Phillips, writing in the daily online journal The Scientist, on February 20 deconstructed the striking new finding and put it into perspective.
The study focused on the recently discovered hormone ghrelin, which is released into the bloodstream by the stomach when empty and travels to the brain where it stimulates appetite.
Until now ghrelin's function in other areas of the brain has not been characterized.
The Yale scientists created a line of mice genetically engineered to lack the gene necessary to produce ghrelin: these mice were found to have 25% fewer connections in the hippocampus, the brain area involved in forming new memories.
The investigators then injected normal mice with extra ghrelin: they formed additional connections in their hippocampal regions.
When these enhanced mice were tested, they demonstrated improved learning and recall.
Here's Phillips's The Scientist story.
- Hunger hormone tied to learning
Study shows ghrelin improves learning and memory, but some researchers remain unconvinced
The neurohormone ghrelin, best known for its role in appetite and energy metabolism, also influences learning and memory, according to a new study in Nature Neuroscience.
Specifically, Sabrina Diano of Yale University School of Medicine and her colleagues found that high levels of ghrelin in rodents can alter hippocampal morphology and improve performance on memory and learning tasks.
This pattern may have provided an evolutionary advantage, the authors speculate, by boosting memory skills during food searches when animals are hungry.
The study doesn’t prove that normal levels of circulating ghrelin control learning and memory, said Robert Steiner of the University of Washington in Seattle, but "it still is a pretty interesting concept" that ghrelin can modulate hippocampal function and memory performance.
"It establishes a nice platform for further investigation, particularly in the pharmacological realm," added Steiner, who was not involved in the research.
Ghrelin is released primarily from stomach epithelial cells when the stomach is empty and binds to receptors in several areas of the body.
It stimulates the release of growth hormone and also acts at hypothalamic feeding centers to increase hunger.
Ghrelin receptors have also been found in many brain areas outside the hypothalamus, Steiner said, including in the hippocampus.
Previous work has pointed to a correlation between ghrelin and spatial memory tasks, said Yogendra Shrestha of the University of Georgia in Athens, but Diano and her co-workers have "gone into great detail" by examining changes in anatomy and electrophysiology.
The researchers first confirmed that peripheral ghrelin crosses the blood-brain barrier and enters the hippocampal formation.
They next found that the density of dendritic spine synapses in the hippocampus—a measure of synaptic plasticity that correlates with spatial memory and learning—was significantly higher in mice that were injected with ghrelin versus non-injected controls.
Ghrelin knockout mice also had significantly fewer dendritic spines than did their wild-type littermates.
When ghrelin knockouts were injected with ghrelin, however, their spine synapse density increased.
The authors also found that ghrelin treatment increased long-term potentiation (LTP) in hippocampal slice preparations.
Diano and her colleagues then tested the effects of ghrelin administration in several learning and memory tasks.
First, injecting rats peripherally with ghrelin or a ghrelin-receptor agonist improved their performance on a maze task that depends on hippocampal function.
Next, injecting ghrelin into the cerebral ventricles after training on an avoidance task improved task learning not only in wild-type mice but also in mice that display the pathological and cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease.
Lastly, the authors found that ghrelin-knockout mice fare worse during object recognition tasks that employ the hippocampus, but improve after peripheral ghrelin administration.
The results are "quite surprising," according to Michael Cowley of Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, who didn’t participate in this study.
Showing that learning improves with ghrelin supplementation even in wild-type animals suggests that, "in situations of fasting, you can get increases in this kind of performance in normal animals," Cowley said.
Learning and memory may be enhanced by high levels of ghrelin during food deprivation because animals need increased cognitive skills to track down food sources, Diano told The Scientist.
However, Steiner cautioned that the researchers injected a concentration of ghrelin that's several orders of magnitude above what would be found in the bloodstream, which means that normal fluctuations in ghrelin due to food deprivation may have nothing to do with learning or memory.
Ghrelin is also produced in the brain, suggesting that differences seen in ghrelin knockouts may be due to disrupted ghrelin expression there, rather than in the stomach, Christian Broberger of the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, also not a co-author, told The Scientist in an Email.
It’s also a bit surprising that ghrelin would have positive effects on learning and memory, according to David E. Cummings of the University of Washington, because the hormone insulin has also been shown to improve learning and memory, and ghrelin and insulin usually have opposite effects.
Even if ghrelin fluctuations do not normally influence memory, Steiner said, high doses of ghrelin or an analog could still make good candidates for treatment of age-related memory problems.
"I’m more enthusiastic about the pharmacologic and pharmacotherapeutic implications of the study than I am about whether or not the physiological arguments that they developed are true."
********************
Note that in the online version of the story above, there are numerous direct links to other work in this area as well as an excellent list of references, also live–linked.
I have long behaved as if hunger enhances memory and learning.
I intentionally delay eating when I'm famished and have intellectual work to do, for several reasons:
1) I'm just contrary
2) The reward is always better the harder the path to it
3) It just seems to me that I can remember things better when I hear my stomach growling, and that I work faster and more efficiently with food as the carrot dangling out there on the end of the stick. Even if it's a giant zucchini.
4) As a more widely experienced corollary, many — if not most — people find they are less alert and more relaxed after a large meal.
[via Rob Stein and the Washington Post]
February 27, 2006 at 10:01 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef00d83477720453ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BehindTheMedspeak: Does hunger make you smarter?:
Comments
I know I am less alert and more relaxed particularly after a high-carb meal--something I should never have at lunch because it tends to make the afternoon miserable.
Had a wrap sandwich before a two hour meeting this evening (5-7PM) after a day's work. I wonder what that meeting was about...I know it was long, and I almost had to prop my eyelids open. Fortunately, I didn't have to contribute.
Posted by: riannan | Feb 27, 2006 8:38:41 PM
I've known a couple of people who were made MEANER by hunger -- let them get an empty tummy, and watch out. Mad as a hornet. Wonder what that's all about. The "smarter" thing makes sense for people, I guess, in evolutionary terms. Get ravenous, need to kill wart hog for tasy supper roasted over spit in front of cave, hunger edge causes hyper-alert stealthiness, Old Snort takes wrong turn in veldt, and boom - yummy hog meat sammich. Then sleep.
Although. Yesterday I went to the Met Opera's southeastern regional auditions down here in metro Atlanta, and I had gone and done my hour-long fast-walking thing just before and was starving throughout the whole affair. My stomach was putting out such a roar that neighboring audience members were becoming irritated. Like I could just tell it to shut up or something. Anyhow, the whole deal lasted four and a half hours. (You have to really LOVE opera. Fortunately, I do.) At the end I felt kind of dazed and spacey and lethargic. (Hearing "Depuis le jour" four or five times can do that to you.) Certainly not up to any intellectual task, or wart hog hunting. But then, the idea of MY participating in "intellectual" work of any kind is pretty much hysterical.
Posted by: Flutist | Feb 27, 2006 4:50:46 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.


