« Secret Cash Stash Personalized Key Ring | Home | Mutant Measure »
August 06, 2006
Closer to fine — Or, 'what Shamu taught me about a happy marriage'
Amy Sutherland was the New York Times "Modern Love" column essayist back on June 25.
This feature appears every Sunday in the Styles section of the paper, and gives the writer a full half-page (above the fold) to wax eloquent on some topic near and dear.
The essays vary enormously in quality: some are boring after three words, others suited for clipping, filing and rereading from time to time.
Sutherland's is the latter.
Long story short: After 12 years of marriage her husband Scott was starting to get on her nerves so she tried to "improve" him by nagging and taking him to see a marriage counselor.
Predictable nil results.
Then, in the course of researching a book about a school for exotic animal trainers, she had an epiphany: reward behavior she liked and ignore the rest.
Bingo.
Suddenly, things got better.
She wrote, "After two years of exotic animal training, my marriage is far smoother, my husband much easier to love."
I've seen her piece mentioned over the past month-and-a-half or so by numerous others, both in print (even Maureen Dowd liked it) and online, and finally have gotten around to putting it up here for you to enjoy.
Without further ado, then, the essay.
- What Shamu Taught Me About a Happy Marriage
As I wash dishes at the kitchen sink, my husband paces behind me, irritated. "Have you seen my keys?" he snarls, then huffs out a loud sigh and stomps from the room with our dog, Dixie, at his heels, anxious over her favorite human's upset.
In the past I would have been right behind Dixie. I would have turned off the faucet and joined the hunt while trying to soothe my husband with bromides like, "Don't worry, they'll turn up." But that only made him angrier, and a simple case of missing keys soon would become a full-blown angst-ridden drama starring the two of us and our poor nervous dog.
Now, I focus on the wet dish in my hands. I don't turn around. I don't say a word. I'm using a technique I learned from a dolphin trainer.
I love my husband. He's well read, adventurous and does a hysterical rendition of a northern Vermont accent that still cracks me up after 12 years of marriage.
But he also tends to be forgetful, and is often tardy and mercurial. He hovers around me in the kitchen asking if I read this or that piece in The New Yorker when I'm trying to concentrate on the simmering pans. He leaves wadded tissues in his wake. He suffers from serious bouts of spousal deafness but never fails to hear me when I mutter to myself on the other side of the house. "What did you say?" he'll shout.
These minor annoyances are not the stuff of separation and divorce, but in sum they began to dull my love for Scott. I wanted — needed — to nudge him a little closer to perfect, to make him into a mate who might annoy me a little less, who wouldn't keep me waiting at restaurants, a mate who would be easier to love.
So, like many wives before me, I ignored a library of advice books and set about improving him. By nagging, of course, which only made his behavior worse: he'd drive faster instead of slower; shave less frequently, not more; and leave his reeking bike garb on the bedroom floor longer than ever.
We went to a counselor to smooth the edges off our marriage. She didn't understand what we were doing there and complimented us repeatedly on how well we communicated. I gave up. I guessed she was right — our union was better than most — and resigned myself to stretches of slow-boil resentment and occasional sarcasm.
Then something magical happened. For a book I was writing about a school for exotic animal trainers, I started commuting from Maine to California, where I spent my days watching students do the seemingly impossible: teaching hyenas to pirouette on command, cougars to offer their paws for a nail clipping, and baboons to skateboard.
I listened, rapt, as professional trainers explained how they taught dolphins to flip and elephants to paint. Eventually it hit me that the same techniques might work on that stubborn but lovable species, the American husband.
The central lesson I learned from exotic animal trainers is that I should reward behavior I like and ignore behavior I don't. After all, you don't get a sea lion to balance a ball on the end of its nose by nagging. The same goes for the American husband.
Back in Maine, I began thanking Scott if he threw one dirty shirt into the hamper. If he threw in two, I'd kiss him. Meanwhile, I would step over any soiled clothes on the floor without one sharp word, though I did sometimes kick them under the bed. But as he basked in my appreciation, the piles became smaller.
I was using what trainers call "approximations," rewarding the small steps toward learning a whole new behavior. You can't expect a baboon to learn to flip on command in one session, just as you can't expect an American husband to begin regularly picking up his dirty socks by praising him once for picking up a single sock. With the baboon you first reward a hop, then a bigger hop, then an even bigger hop. With Scott the husband, I began to praise every small act every time: if he drove just a mile an hour slower, tossed one pair of shorts into the hamper, or was on time for anything.
I also began to analyze my husband the way a trainer considers an exotic animal. Enlightened trainers learn all they can about a species, from anatomy to social structure, to understand how it thinks, what it likes and dislikes, what comes easily to it and what doesn't. For example, an elephant is a herd animal, so it responds to hierarchy. It cannot jump, but can stand on its head. It is a vegetarian.
The exotic animal known as Scott is a loner, but an alpha male. So hierarchy matters, but being in a group doesn't so much. He has the balance of a gymnast, but moves slowly, especially when getting dressed. Skiing comes naturally, but being on time does not. He's an omnivore, and what a trainer would call food-driven.
Once I started thinking this way, I couldn't stop. At the school in California, I'd be scribbling notes on how to walk an emu or have a wolf accept you as a pack member, but I'd be thinking, "I can't wait to try this on Scott."
On a field trip with the students, I listened to a professional trainer describe how he had taught African crested cranes to stop landing on his head and shoulders. He did this by training the leggy birds to land on mats on the ground. This, he explained, is what is called an "incompatible behavior," a simple but brilliant concept.
Rather than teach the cranes to stop landing on him, the trainer taught the birds something else, a behavior that would make the undesirable behavior impossible. The birds couldn't alight on the mats and his head simultaneously.
At home, I came up with incompatible behaviors for Scott to keep him from crowding me while I cooked. To lure him away from the stove, I piled up parsley for him to chop or cheese for him to grate at the other end of the kitchen island. Or I'd set out a bowl of chips and salsa across the room. Soon I'd done it: no more Scott hovering around me while I cooked.
I followed the students to SeaWorld San Diego, where a dolphin trainer introduced me to least reinforcing syndrome (L. R. S.). When a dolphin does something wrong, the trainer doesn't respond in any way. He stands still for a few beats, careful not to look at the dolphin, and then returns to work. The idea is that any response, positive or negative, fuels a behavior. If a behavior provokes no response, it typically dies away.
In the margins of my notes I wrote, "Try on Scott!"
It was only a matter of time before he was again tearing around the house searching for his keys, at which point I said nothing and kept at what I was doing. It took a lot of discipline to maintain my calm, but results were immediate and stunning. His temper fell far shy of its usual pitch and then waned like a fast-moving storm. I felt as if I should throw him a mackerel.
Now he's at it again; I hear him banging a closet door shut, rustling through papers on a chest in the front hall and thumping upstairs. At the sink, I hold steady. Then, sure enough, all goes quiet. A moment later, he walks into the kitchen, keys in hand, and says calmly, "Found them."
Without turning, I call out, "Great, see you later."
Off he goes with our much-calmed pup.
After two years of exotic animal training, my marriage is far smoother, my husband much easier to love. I used to take his faults personally; his dirty clothes on the floor were an affront, a symbol of how he didn't care enough about me. But thinking of my husband as an exotic species gave me the distance I needed to consider our differences more objectively.
I adopted the trainers' motto: "It's never the animal's fault." When my training attempts failed, I didn't blame Scott. Rather, I brainstormed new strategies, thought up more incompatible behaviors and used smaller approximations. I dissected my own behavior, considered how my actions might inadvertently fuel his. I also accepted that some behaviors were too entrenched, too instinctive to train away. You can't stop a badger from digging, and you can't stop my husband from losing his wallet and keys.
Professionals talk of animals that understand training so well they eventually use it back on the trainer. My animal did the same. When the training techniques worked so beautifully, I couldn't resist telling my husband what I was up to. He wasn't offended, just amused. As I explained the techniques and terminology, he soaked it up. Far more than I realized.
Last fall, firmly in middle age, I learned that I needed braces. They were not only humiliating, but also excruciating. For weeks my gums, teeth, jaw and sinuses throbbed. I complained frequently and loudly. Scott assured me that I would become used to all the metal in my mouth. I did not.
One morning, as I launched into yet another tirade about how uncomfortable I was, Scott just looked at me blankly. He didn't say a word or acknowledge my rant in any way, not even with a nod.
I quickly ran out of steam and started to walk away. Then I realized what was happening, and I turned and asked, "Are you giving me an L. R. S.?" Silence. "You are, aren't you?"
He finally smiled, but his L. R. S. has already done the trick. He'd begun to train me, the American wife.
August 6, 2006 at 10:01 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef00d834a5836b53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Closer to fine — Or, 'what Shamu taught me about a happy marriage':
Comments
I never got any sense of man-hating at work. The concept of "nudging" someone "a little closer to perfect" is what alarms me. I don't care what technique a person uses to manipulate her spouse into annoying her less - all I'm saying is that the imperfections are never all one person's.
Posted by: Flutist | Aug 8, 2006 10:27:23 PM
Everybody, lighten up. It's not misandry, just an observation re: human nature and how to get along with people. I use it on everybody now, and it makes their life and mine easier.
Posted by: Linda | Aug 8, 2006 9:25:42 PM
ooops sorry need to go back to school and check my spelling? After all these years. Who would have thunk it? Trivial? What is correct way to spell trivial or trival? No spell checker here. Hahaha.
Also I agree with mb, cancer and rockets are the "big stuff" now.
Posted by: Rhonda | Aug 7, 2006 12:16:36 PM
This is almost hysterical if wasn't so serious. After almost 26 years of marriage and 3 Wonderful sons, and a beautiful granddaughter, I can honestly say that I have never tried to change him. And for the life of me I dont' know what I would have changed him into?? I do not want a man that says yes to everything I say. I do not want a man that cannot think for himself. I do not want a man that has to have his nose right up my ...well you know what. Also I don't want my man doing laundry, housework or whatever. I do like it though when he does "help" me. I was raised that mom's and wives do that stuff. MEN work, work, work. On the house, at the job, on the lawn, cars, motorcycles, etc etc. If anything he's changed on me. As I am sure I have on him. I just live and let live, whatever makes your boat float. If ya'll can just get on with life and stop worrying over the silly stuff then that's all that matters. Also LOVE does make the difference here. UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. No matter what we do we always know that we have that. Doesn't matter if the clothes are dirty or clean we know we always know that they get done eventually. One day. Someday. Hopefully the day you need them. Mom will make sure they are. Hehehe
Apparently Amy has never been a mom as of yet. Otherwise all this she is writing about is very trival.
Posted by: Rhonda | Aug 7, 2006 12:00:36 PM
Funny. Another version of live and let live. Or don't sweat the small stuff. (hint: everything is small stuff, except biggies like cancer, rockets in your neighborhood, etc.)
Posted by: Mb | Aug 6, 2006 3:02:52 PM
I found this article kind of irritating, actually. Let's see, she's saddled with a well-read, adventurous, funny (and I would assume smart, successful and basically decent and responsible, or she wouldn't have hung around for long) kind of guy that she loves but whose "minor annoyances" have driven her to try to fix him. Frankly, it sounds a bit like whining. Guess what -- people can be irritating. Sharing space on a daily basis can be REAL irritating. Near the end of the article she does reveal that she "considered" how her behavior might contribute to the problem, but there's a sense that the husband is the faulty one and she is beyond reproach. You know what? It takes two -- always. What makes her think she didn't drive him crazy a long time ago? Frankly this whole thing sounds kind of passive-aggressive. Sometimes not so passive. Her bio sounds like she's seriously busy and involved in life, with plenty of interesting work to keep her occupied. So it's strange to be fixated on fixing her husband; that's the kind of thing that people tend to do when they're bored and not using their talents. When you start getting your undies in a wad over someone else's irritating ways, it's usually time to take an in-depth look at your own situation.
I like her bunches as a writer. I just don't care for the "my shit don't stink" attitude.
Posted by: Flutist | Aug 6, 2006 1:16:09 PM
Great article.
This is basically the same tenets of neo-childrearing manuals - praise the good behavior, ignore the tantrums. It has varying results with all males (big or small).
When my son was small, I noticed very similar theories between properly training a dog and a toddler.
Know your animal, I guess, is the key. (And, unfortunately, I think ignoring all bad behavior is the key to many viable marriages - even when said bad behavior moves beyond losing your keys and getting in the way in the kitchen. My point is that toleration should depend on the bad behavior itself - not the animal.)
Posted by: Shawn Lea | Aug 6, 2006 12:40:46 PM
