« Helpful Hints from joeeze: Got scorch marks? Then you need an Iron Shield | Home | Digital Photo Keychain »

April 17, 2007

There's something [different] about bookofjoe this month

B0002u9k7w01lzzzzzzz

Have you noticed that I've pretty much abandoned my longtime default 200-pixel-wide thumbnail size for photos and whatnot that break up the type?

I made the change in late March because it seemed to me that oftimes it was too hard to see details in the default illustration and people who don't have fast connections or much time might not want to wait for the larger picture to come up.

Is this new practice a good thing?

A bad thing?

Nothing?

You tell me.

April 17, 2007 at 10:01 AM | Permalink


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef00d8341c5df653ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference There's something [different] about bookofjoe this month:

Comments

Hey Joe

Oh go with blatant once in awhile! I like the big images and like the variety too

:)

Posted by: pambamboo | Apr 18, 2007 1:32:04 AM

Joe,

I have been watching. Seems to me that around 300 pixels seems to be close to ideal, given the better resolution of today's monitors (200 is probably sub-optimal). Above 300 or so, however, the images just seem too...blatant. In-your-face-dominant. Like a drill-sergeant .jpg or something...!

Posted by: Steve Woodruff | Apr 17, 2007 12:32:39 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.