« High-Rise Sprinkler | Home | Car Finder »
May 18, 2008
BehindTheMedspeak: Does running outdoors burn more calories?
Anahad O'Connor, in his "Really?" column in the May 6, 2008 New York Times Science section, gives it to you straight: Yes, about 5% more — but the advantage is more than offset by an increased risk of stress fractures.
Here's the piece.
- The Claim: Running Outdoors Burns More Calories
The Facts: Pavement or treadmill? Most avid runners have a strong preference for one or the other, but how do the two differ in producing results?
According to several studies, the answer is not so simple. Researchers have found in general that while outdoor running tends to promote a more intense exercise, running on a treadmill helps reduce the likelihood of injury, and thus may allow some people to run longer and farther.
A number of studies have shown that in general, outdoor running burns about 5 percent more calories than treadmills do, in part because there is greater wind resistance and no assistance from the treadmill belt. Some studies show, for example, that when adults are allowed to set their own paces on treadmills and on tracks, they move more slowly and with shorter strides when they train on treadmills.
But other studies show that treadmill exercisers suffer fewer stress injuries in the leg. One study published in 2003 in the British journal of sports medicine, for example, analyzed a group of runners and found significantly higher rates of bone strain and tension during pavement running than during treadmill running, particularly in the tibia, or shinbone. This increased strain can heighten the risk of stress fractures by more than 50 percent, the study found.
The Bottom Line: Studies suggest that running on pavement generally burns slightly more calories, but also raises the risk of stress fractures.
May 18, 2008 at 02:01 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/13133/29200546
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BehindTheMedspeak: Does running outdoors burn more calories?:
Comments
I didn't think I'd ever be able to run again...I got the gimpy knee and it is going to need replaced some day.
I will say this -- the treadmill doesn't hurt at all...and when I need to get off, I press STOP. If I'm out side and need to stop, I'm most likely 5 miles from where I need to be. I just did 35 miles on my new bike today trying to break it in. I don't know how many miles an average runner does (I'm lucky to get 3 or 4 miles in a night on the treadmill...when I actually feel like hitting the gym) but I couldn't imagine going a few miles out, twisting an ankle and having to limp home. At least with my bike, I can repair most problems in the field...I'm not about to try that with my body.
So running inside is where it is.
Posted by: clifyt | May 18, 2008 10:11:41 PM
Stress fractures, shmess fractures. The real risk of running on pavement is some drunken moron running you down, or his/her passengers testing out their new Li'l Bastard slingshots. Or Glocks.
So go ahead and run on your treadmill, then try giving your cat/dog (but mainly cat) a bath. That'll burn off that extra 5% of calories you missed. Heh heh.
Posted by: Flautist | May 18, 2008 5:50:14 PM
