« Shoe Bag | Home | Russian Eye Chart T-Shirt »
July 04, 2008
How do you spell WALL•E?
Disney and Pixar — who ought to know — say it's "WALL•E."
End of discussion.
Right?
Not quite.
Some media organizations are having difficulty getting their heads around the new world.
For example, the New York Times uses a dash instead of a dot and can't bring itself to capitalize letters after the first:
The Wall Street Journal uses all caps but can't manage the dot, instead opting for the Times-ish dash:
The Washington Post does it right:
Why is it a problem to simply use the name given by the namer?
Simple.
The Grey Lady has its own internal punctuation and style standards that trump the actual name chosen for a product.
Thus, a Times headline begins
instead of iPod.
This is not the cause of the Times' ongoing, accelerating collapse but, rather, a symptom, somewhat like the refusal of the paper to print email addresses for every reporter under their byline.
I emailed Bill Keller, executive editor of the paper, a few years back and pointed out to him that Podunk publications like my hometown Charlottesville Daily Progress were already doing this and maybe it was time for his ocean liner to change course.
He responded that they were "looking at this" but I guess the visual field must be really large 'cause it still hasn't happened.
e.e. cummings, call your office — your capitalization is ready.
July 4, 2008 at 12:01 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/13133/30777596
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How do you spell WALL•E?:
Comments
There was an interesting conversation over at 37Signals a few weeks ago that was a bit snarky and self-aggrandizing about this same subject. Pretty much, even though they spelled their name weirdly, they expected everyone to do so (even if someone spelled it exactly as it was listed on their LLC registrant application -- space after 7 and no cap S).
But pretty much, the rational commenters left some interesting internal style guides talking about the fact that most companies would love it if newspapers and otherwise used their wordmark as pictualized as opposed to what makes sense to readers. For instance, my company's registered trademark is in the form of a pictualized image (hmmm...I need to get that (R) after it somewhere, but it seems too corporate). Most newspapers to the right thing and print things the way they should be read and forget about the stupid (R) or (TM).
So for me, as much as I loved the movie, it is Wall-E and it is good enough.
Posted by: clifyt | Jul 4, 2008 4:21:46 PM
As Pixar decided to add a non-standard keyboard character that HAS to be looked up, screw-em. They could at least have made it WALL-E or WALL.E. But Dot/Hyphen, they did that just to screw with everyone.
And I'm a guy who gets picky when someone confuses Mini with MINI. At least they are two different products, and the change in caplization denotes a distinct before period and a distinct after period, without losing the name.
Posted by: Rocketboy | Jul 4, 2008 8:11:13 PM



