« Barrette à message (Notice hair slide) | Home | Folding Saw »

September 27, 2009

Is 'poof' the [near-future] meaning of dictionary.com?

Don't look for meaning look for use

Chadwick Matlin, in an interesting article in today's Washington Post Business section, took a close look at the current state of online dictionaries and how Google, if it wanted to, could effectively destroy them — in a heartbeat.

Long story short: when you put a word into the Google search box, you don't get its meaning but rather a list of sites which offer the definition.

With Microsoft's Bing, on the other hand, when you put a word in the search box, the definition appears up top as the first result.

Wrote Matlin, "The dictionary sites know that a new day is coming.... Bing, remember, is small-bore. It routes only 10.7 percent of the country's searches compared with Google's 64.6 percent. (Though it is gaining market share quickly.) The thing that would really upset the dictionary sites' business would be a change in the way Google handles their content. What happens if Google starts acting like Bing?"

"If Google goes Bing, then dictionaries' traffic will go poof."

Indeed.

September 27, 2009 at 04:01 PM | Permalink


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef0120a5f7e125970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is 'poof' the [near-future] meaning of dictionary.com?:

Comments

I'm a fan of Ninjawords myself.

Posted by: Rocketboy | Sep 27, 2009 6:30:14 PM

Thus opens the site that will have a myriad of information on the word, not just a simple definition (most would settle for the simple). I myself like to see the word used in a sentence or two, or three, but even more creative, specific examples would truly make me a subscriber. But as you stated, most existing sites would become extinct.

Posted by: Joe Peach | Sep 27, 2009 5:14:09 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.