March 21, 2010
Imitation is the sincerest form of staying alive
Not a mixed metaphor but, rather, a summary of Sean B. Carroll's February 16, 2010 New York Times Science section essay on Henry Walter Bates, a now-forgotten Englishman who spent 11 years, from 1848 to 1859, roaming the Amazon jungle, returning with over 14,000 specimens, evidence unknown to Darwin until that time that supported his controversial new theory of evolution.
Wrote Carroll, "When Bates’s scientific paper describing various imitations was published, Darwin told him it was 'one of the most remarkable and admirable papers I ever read in my life' and 'it will have lasting value.'"
Carroll's piece follows.
Imitators That Hide in Plain Sight, and Stay Alive
In the summer of 1859, an Englishman named Henry Walter Bates returned home after 11 years of roaming the vast Amazon jungle with specimens of more than 14,000 species he had collected.
His timing was uncanny. Just as Bates set about organizing and describing his vast collection, Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species” was published, which gave Bates an entirely new way of thinking about all that he had seen in the jungle.
He was able to provide some fresh and very timely evidence in support of natural selection because it explained a phenomenon he had closely observed, one that intrigued him and continues to hold the attention of naturalists today: the close resemblance of some animals to living or inanimate objects.
It is a pity that the work of Bates is so little known, not only because of its value but also because it was accomplished at considerable personal cost. He had traveled to South America with Alfred Russel Wallace, who was to forever live in Darwin’s shadow as the other person who came up with the theory of evolution by natural selection.
Bates and Wallace arrived together in Brazil in May 1848, but split up after a year or so exploring the Amazon, ostensibly to “cover more territory.” This was probably a Victorian gentleman’s way of saying that after living in close quarters, they got on each other’s nerves.
After a year on his own, Bates nearly gave up. He had received no money from his agent in England (who was to sell specimens Bates shipped back from the Amazon). His clothes were worn to rags. He was shoeless — “a great inconvenience in tropical forests,” he noted. And he had been robbed of nearly all of his money.
Just as he was planning to leave Brazil, Bates caught yellow fever and became too sick to travel. It was a lucky break for Bates and for science. While recovering, he received money from his agent and news that his collections were a success in England. He turned around and plunged back into the jungle for eight more years.
On his return to England and his encounter with Darwin’s great opus, Bates soon realized that he had noticed some things that Darwin had not mentioned but that could support Darwin’s controversial new theory. Bates wrote to the famous naturalist, “I think I have got a glimpse into the laboratory where Nature manufactures her new species.”
Darwin was very excited. He was taking a beating from critics over “On the Origin of Species.” He was eager to hear whatever fresh evidence this hardy explorer, newly returned from the wilds of South America, could provide.
In “On the Origin of Species,” Darwin relied heavily on the analogy between artificial selection by humans for desirable traits of livestock and natural selection for traits in the wild. Now Bates had a whole new body of evidence for natural selection in the wild.
Bates explained to Darwin that he had found many instances in which a completely harmless and potentially edible animal resembled a distasteful, inedible, noxious or poisonous species. He observed flies that looked like bees, beetles that looked like wasps, even caterpillars that looked like pit vipers. He referred to these as “analogous resemblances” or “mimetic analogies.”
Bates deduced that defenseless mimics gained an advantage by resembling well-defended species. He concluded that the many cases he had observed were not mere coincidences, as the mimicking forms only occurred in the same geographical area as the species they imitated. He offered the phenomenon, still referred to today as Batesian mimicry, as “a most beautiful proof of the theory of natural selection.”
Some less scientific, more sentimental naturalists of the day were inclined to view these resemblances among species as merely nature’s proclivity for beauty and ornamentation, not the consequence of the battle of nature. Bates countered by pointing to other kinds of imitations, like moths and caterpillars that resembled bird droppings. Where was the beauty in that, he asked?
There is good experimental evidence for Batesian mimicry and the advantages gained by innocuous animals that resemble well-defended animals. But, until recently, there were few tests of how the imitation of bird waste, thorns, twigs or stones actually works. The challenge is to distinguish whether the ruse is a matter of concealment, with the predator failing to detect the animal, or a case of “masquerade,” with the predator actually detecting the imitator, misidentifying it as something inedible, and then ignoring it.
Recently, the biologists John Skelhorn and Graeme D. Ruxton at the University of Glasgow and their collaborators Hannah M. Rowland and Michael P. Speed at the University of Liverpool devised such a test using the twig-imitating caterpillars of the brimstone moth and early thorn moth as prey .
For masquerade to work, a predator must have had some experience with the objects being imitated. So the scientists divided young chickens into several groups — one group was exposed to a hawthorn branch, which is a common home for the caterpillars, another group was exposed to a hawthorn branch that was wound in colored thread in order to alter its appearance, and a third group was exposed only to an empty testing cage.
The groups were then, in turn, split into three — one getting a single brimstone caterpillar, one getting a single early thorn caterpillar, and the third getting a plain hawthorn twig in otherwise empty cages. The researchers then measured how long it took the chicks with different previous experiences to attack the caterpillars, or to peck at the twig.
Even when the caterpillars were the only objects in sight, birds that had been exposed to natural hawthorn branches took much longer to attack the caterpillars or the twig, several minutes on average compared with just seconds for birds that had not encountered the hawthorn branch or been exposed to the branch wrapped in colored thread.
The experiment demonstrated that the birds that had encountered the hawthorn branch subsequently misidentified the masquerading caterpillars as twigs, even at close range and in plain view. Masquerade appears to be a widespread defense strategy. Dr. Skelhorn and his colleagues noted that at least 50 species of British moths and butterflies alone resemble inanimate objects at some point in their life cycle.
The jungle creatures that enthralled Bates use what are now recognized as four distinct strategies to avoid being eaten — mimicry; concealment, known as crypsis; the display of warning colors; and masquerading as inedible objects.
When Bates’s scientific paper [below]
describing various imitations was published, Darwin told him it was “one of the most remarkable and admirable papers I ever read in my life” and ‘it will have lasting value.” Prescient praise from perhaps the most well-read naturalist of that or any century.
What is it?
Answer here this time tomorrow.
lamebook — 'The funniest and lamest of Facebook'
I won't argue.
Adds the site, "Funny Facebook statuses, Fails, LOLs and More."
Fair warning: Major potential time sink.
There goes the day....
Alien Glow-in-the-Dark Soap
See, the glow part is for you, Earthling.
We see fine in the dark.
Jobs of yesteryear: Obsolete occupations
[via Shawn Lea]
Inside-Out Spaghetti & Meatballs
Oh, you want to know how to make your own?
137 years of Popular Science
Wrote Nick Grant: "Now online, searchable and free."
The way we like it.
Take a trip in the PopSci time machine all the way back to its founding in 1872, seven years after the end of the Civil War.
That's a lot of science.
iMac Bondi Blue Keyboard Clock
Handmade from a retired 1998-era iMac keyboard.
Clear quartz movement, runs on 1 AA battery (included)