« Cordless Rechargeable Heated Ice Scraper | Home | Skid Mark Brief Safe »

January 18, 2007

"The best test of whether something should be banned is not 'is it distasteful?' but 'is anyone harmed?'"

1hohljhj

From a leader (editorial to you, Americanzi) about the practice of creating genetic chimeras in the current (January 13, 2007) issue of The Economist.

2nobanning480

The test above perfectly summarizes my point of view — same as it ever was since I was a teenager.

3nohomework480

I may not be right but at least I'm consistent.

Vhkjhjhh_1

You idiot — not that picture....

Note: A position on my crack research team™ has suddenly become available.

Apply within.

We are an equal opportunity employer: any fool can make her- or himself right at home without any worries.

Many currently do.

But I digress.

January 18, 2007 at 04:01 PM | Permalink


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef00d8350f2c9569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "The best test of whether something should be banned is not 'is it distasteful?' but 'is anyone harmed?'":

Comments

A foolish little hobgoblin consistently minds.

Or is that,
A little consistency fools hobgoblins, mind.

I forget.

Posted by: Flautist | Jan 18, 2007 9:49:20 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.