« Stealth Keyboard — Episode 2: Return of the Das | Home | Powdered Peanut Butter »
September 19, 2007
BehindTheMedspeak: 'Tattoo-Induced Skin Burn During MR Imaging'
Say what?
Not an Onion story but a real medical report, published in the American Journal of Radiology in 2000.
Don't believe me?
Read it for yourself.
- Tattoo-Induced Skin Burn During MR Imaging
MR-induced skin burns caused by permanent coloring techniques (tattooing) are extremely rare. Eyeliner materials containing metallic substances are known to cause artifacts on cranial MR studies, but rarely is the patient affected.
A 23-year-old man sustained a second-degree skin burn in two skin tattoos while undergoing cervical spine MR imaging at 1.5-T using a phased array coil. The study consisted of a sagittal spoiled gradient-refocused acquisition in the steady state localizer (23 sec), sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo imaging (3 min 44 sec), sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging with multiple (16) 180° radiofrequency (RF) pulses (3 min 16 sec), and axial multiplanar gradient-re-called sequences using gradient acquisition with a 20° flip angle (4 min 23 sec). At the end of the examination the patient complained of a burning sensation in his right deltoid area, which was raised and swollen. The patient was treated in the emergency department for a second-degree skin burn and returned 24 hr later, when multiple color photographs were obtained.
The burns occurred only in the two jet-black thunderbolt tattoos, but not in the Chinese symbol. Although his shoulder may have touched the wall of the magnet, the Chinese symbol tattoo did not cause him to be burned at all. The two adjacent thunderbolt tattoos could have approximated an RF pick-up loop and therefore would have been more prone to preferentially absorb the RF energy.
The tattoo studio was contacted, and the artist stated that all the ink used in their studio was obtained from a single national supplier. He also stated that he had never had a client complain of a skin burn caused by MR imaging. The major supplier of tattoo ink in the United States is Spaulding & Rogers Manufacturing, located outside Albany, NY. A spokesperson for that company stated that the Food and Drug Administration does not give its approval to the use of tattoo ink. Extremely dark tattoo ink contains a high concentration of iron oxide, and this ferrous pigment can become quite concentrated if sedimented ink is used during the tattoo process. He also stated that there is little quality control over foreign-manufactured tattoo ink, especially from China, which is a major international supplier of tattoo ink.
Artistic tattoos have now become mainstream and are no longer found exclusively on sailors and bikers. The tattoos are often very fine and intricate and do not typically use high concentrations of jet-black ink. Iron oxide is both potentially magnetic and an electrical conductor; therefore, the heating could come either from the oscillations of the gradients or, more likely, from the RF-induced electrical currents. Heating raises intracellular water temperature in the skin, resulting in a burn.
In 14 years of experience with thousands of MR studies, we have never had a single skin burn caused by tattoo ink. This report provides graphic proof that a tattoo can potentially cause a second-degree skin burn, particularly if the ink is concentrated (dark) or if the tattoo is in the form of an RF pick-up loop.
The caption for the picture up top that accompanied the report reads: "Color photograph of right deltoid muscle of 23-year-old man with second-degree burns. Black thunderbolts have multiple white areas, which were raised and swollen 24 hr earlier. Red areas outlining thunderbolts are normal, and skin with Chinese symbol is normal."
It's amazing, the medical knowledge you can gain by a close reading of the Wall Street Journal, where yesterday I learned for the very first time that such a thing can happen.
September 19, 2007 at 04:01 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef00e54ee0e77f8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BehindTheMedspeak: 'Tattoo-Induced Skin Burn During MR Imaging':
Comments
Mythbusters tackled this one a while ago.
From the wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tattoo :
"There has been concern expressed about the interaction between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures and tattoo pigments, some of which contain trace metals. Allegedly, the magnetic fields produced by MRI machines could interact with these metal particles, potentially causing burns or distortions in the image. The television show MythBusters tested the theory, and found no interaction between tattoo inks and MRI."
Posted by: Kate | Sep 25, 2007 6:49:15 AM
This was part and parcel of a recent "House" marathon over the past weekend. One of the episodes involved a patient who had tattoos he got while in jail, needed an MRI and was on death row. From what I viewed of the episode, he suffered during his MRI due to the metal content in his tatoos.
Posted by: NotCreativeEnough | Sep 20, 2007 11:36:48 PM
The problem does not apply to many tattoos - especially older ones. The problem is with tattoos that have a high metal content, which adds a sparkle or sheen to them. It's not the ink itself that heats up - it's the metal in some inks that heats up and burns.
When you have an MRI you are asked if you have any metal in your body - staples, splints, screws, etc - and tattoos with metal based inks are included.
Posted by: Elux Troxl | Sep 20, 2007 10:24:19 PM
"Now, Joe - why not call MR what it really is? The "N" word was dropped because of fear that the public would reject the procedure."
More likely 'cos they can't pronounce it.
Posted by: Skipweasel | Sep 20, 2007 8:22:44 AM
Yet another good reason not to have a tattoo.
Now, Joe - why not call MR what it really is? The "N" word was dropped because of fear that the public would reject the procedure.
Moreover, what in the wild, wild world of medicine are we doing about vets returning with ferrous fragments scattered through the (remainder) of their bodies? The magnetic field ought to dislodge shrapnel. Any literature on this yet?
Finally, what the @#$% are hospitals doing still banning cell phones for the public (docs are immune) where these monster RF field inducing magnetic field generators are on sight? The facts just don't add up!
Posted by: 6.02*10^23 | Sep 20, 2007 8:05:37 AM
No burns when I had my MRI, but my tattoo doesn't have a lot of black.
Posted by: Sherri | Sep 19, 2007 8:38:48 PM
I belive this was a Mythbusters episode.
Posted by: James | Sep 19, 2007 4:07:14 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.



