« February 7, 2008 | Main | February 9, 2008 »

February 8, 2008

Q. Why is Nosovicky Zeli like Parmesan cheese and Prosciutto di Parma?


Tough one, what?

A. Nosovicky Zeli (sauerkraut) from the region that first produced it the Czech Republic has just been granted a wine-style appellation d'origine.

Of all the world's media only The Financial Times, going where no other publication dared go, brought its readers this mouth-watering news (scroll down).

You could look it up.

Here's the FT's February 6, 2008 "Observer" item with the details.


    One might think that one jar of pickled cabbage tastes much like another. Not in the Czech Republic, where it was often the only vegetable available during four decades of Communist rule, creating a nation of connoisseurs. This distinction has now been rightly recognised by the European Commission.

    Nosovicky zeli, or sauerkraut, from the region that first produced it in the country, has been granted a wine-style appellation d’origine. The system, created to protect the likes of Parma ham and Parmesan cheese, now covers hundreds of lesser-known products.

    The sauerkraut must be prepared in the Moravian town of Nosovice “using recognised know-how”. Observer’s man with the dumplings conducted a poll of a Prague office and found no one who had heard of it. Now, we are sure, they will accept nothing less.

February 8, 2008 at 04:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Low Profile Cable Clamps


From the website:

    Flat Cable Clamps

    Made from extruded PVC, these small, flat cable clamps are just the thing for clipping and holding small-gauge wires and cords.

    An adhesive-backed foam mounting pad holds the clip securely in position.

    Small clips are 1/2" high and the large clips are 7/8" high.

    Each size is available in 15mm and 25mm (1") widths.



20 for $1.40–$2, depending on size.

February 8, 2008 at 03:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Cloud computing and thin clients: your time has come


Reading Ellen Nakashima's probing front page story in yesterday's Washington Post about the increasing number of travelers whose computers and cellphones are being seized and examined at U.S. borders was the canary in the coal mine.

Because the only thing you can say with 100% certainty is that such scrutiny will steadily increase in both frequency and intensity.

You have two choices: complain and hope, or simply avoid the problem by leaving devices containing information you don't want to share or lose at home.

Here's the article.

    Clarity Sought on Electronics Searches

    U.S. Agents Seize Travelers' Devices

    Nabila Mango, a therapist and a U.S. citizen who has lived in the country since 1965, had just flown in from Jordan last December when, she said, she was detained at customs and her cellphone was taken from her purse. Her daughter, waiting outside San Francisco International Airport, tried repeatedly to call her during the hour and a half she was questioned. But after her phone was returned, Mango saw that records of her daughter's calls had been erased.

    A few months earlier in the same airport, a tech engineer returning from a business trip to London objected when a federal agent asked him to type his password into his laptop computer. "This laptop doesn't belong to me," he remembers protesting. "It belongs to my company." Eventually, he agreed to log on and stood by as the officer copied the Web sites he had visited, said the engineer, a U.S. citizen who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of calling attention to himself.

    Maria Udy, a marketing executive with a global travel management firm in Bethesda, said her company laptop was seized by a federal agent as she was flying from Dulles International Airport to London in December 2006. Udy, a British citizen, said the agent told her he had "a security concern" with her. "I was basically given the option of handing over my laptop or not getting on that flight," she said.

    The seizure of electronics at U.S. borders has prompted protests from travelers who say they now weigh the risk of traveling with sensitive or personal information on their laptops, cameras or cellphones. In some cases, companies have altered their policies to require employees to safeguard corporate secrets by clearing laptop hard drives before international travel.

    Today, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Asian Law Caucus, two civil liberties groups in San Francisco, plan to file a lawsuit to force the government to disclose its policies on border searches, including which rules govern the seizing and copying of the contents of electronic devices. They also want to know the boundaries for asking travelers about their political views, religious practices and other activities potentially protected by the First Amendment. The question of whether border agents have a right to search electronic devices at all without suspicion of a crime is already under review in the federal courts.

    The lawsuit was inspired by two dozen cases, 15 of which involved searches of cellphones, laptops, MP3 players and other electronics. Almost all involved travelers of Muslim, Middle Eastern or South Asian background, many of whom, including Mango and the tech engineer, said they are concerned they were singled out because of racial or religious profiling.

    A U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman, Lynn Hollinger, said officers do not engage in racial profiling "in any way, shape or form." She said that "it is not CBP's intent to subject travelers to unwarranted scrutiny" and that a laptop may be seized if it contains information possibly tied to terrorism, narcotics smuggling, child pornography or other criminal activity.

    The reason for a search is not always made clear. The Association of Corporate Travel Executives, which represents 2,500 business executives in the United States and abroad, said it has tracked complaints from several members, including Udy, whose laptops have been seized and their contents copied before usually being returned days later, said Susan Gurley, executive director of ACTE. Gurley said none of the travelers who have complained to the ACTE raised concerns about racial or ethnic profiling. Gurley said none of the travelers were charged with a crime.

    "I was assured that my laptop would be given back to me in 10 or 15 days," said Udy, who continues to fly into and out of the United States. She said the federal agent copied her log-on and password, and asked her to show him a recent document and how she gains access to Microsoft Word. She was asked to pull up her e-mail but could not because of lack of Internet access. With ACTE's help, she pressed for relief. More than a year later, Udy has received neither her laptop nor an explanation.

    ACTE last year filed a Freedom of Information Act request to press the government for information on what happens to data seized from laptops and other electronic devices. "Is it destroyed right then and there if the person is in fact just a regular business traveler?" Gurley asked. "People are quite concerned. They don't want proprietary business information floating, not knowing where it has landed or where it is going. It increases the anxiety level."

    Udy has changed all her work passwords and no longer banks online. Her company, Radius, has tightened its data policies so that traveling employees must access company information remotely via an encrypted channel, and their laptops must contain no company information.

    At least two major global corporations, one American and one Dutch, have told their executives not to carry confidential business material on laptops on overseas trips, Gurley said. In Canada, one law firm has instructed its lawyers to travel to the United States with "blank laptops" whose hard drives contain no data. "We just access our information through the Internet," said Lou Brzezinski, a partner at Blaney McMurtry, a major Toronto law firm. That approach also holds risks, but "those are hacking risks as opposed to search risks," he said.

    The U.S. government has argued in a pending court case that its authority to protect the country's border extends to looking at information stored in electronic devices such as laptops without any suspicion of a crime. In border searches, it regards a laptop the same as a suitcase.

    "It should not matter... whether documents and pictures are kept in 'hard copy' form in an executive's briefcase or stored digitally in a computer. The authority of customs officials to search the former should extend equally to searches of the latter," the government argued in the child pornography case being heard by a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco.

    As more and more people travel with laptops, BlackBerrys and cellphones, the government's laptop-equals-suitcase position is raising red flags.

    "It's one thing to say it's reasonable for government agents to open your luggage," said David D. Cole, a law professor at Georgetown University. "It's another thing to say it's reasonable for them to read your mind and everything you have thought over the last year. What a laptop records is as personal as a diary but much more extensive. It records every Web site you have searched. Every e-mail you have sent. It's as if you're crossing the border with your home in your suitcase."

    If the government's position on searches of electronic files is upheld, new risks will confront anyone who crosses the border with a laptop or other device, said Mark Rasch, a technology security expert with FTI Consulting and a former federal prosecutor. "Your kid can be arrested because they can't prove the songs they downloaded to their iPod were legally downloaded," he said. "Lawyers run the risk of exposing sensitive information about their client. Trade secrets can be exposed to customs agents with no limit on what they can do with it. Journalists can expose sources, all because they have the audacity to cross an invisible line."

    Hollinger said customs officers "are trained to protect confidential information."

    Shirin Sinnar, a staff attorney with the Asian Law Caucus, said that by scrutinizing the Web sites people search and the phone numbers they've stored on their cellphones, "the government is going well beyond its traditional role of looking for contraband and really is looking into the content of people's thoughts and ideas and their lawful political activities."

    If conducted inside the country, such searches would require a warrant and probable cause, legal experts said.

    Customs sometimes singles out passengers for extensive questioning and searches based on "information from various systems and specific techniques for selecting passengers," including the Interagency Border Inspection System, according to a statement on the CBP Web site. "CBP officers may, unfortunately, inconvenience law-abiding citizens in order to detect those involved in illicit activities," the statement said. But the factors agents use to single out passengers are not transparent, and travelers generally have little access to the data to see whether there are errors.

    Although Customs said it does not profile by race or ethnicity, an officers' training guide states that "it is permissible and indeed advisable to consider an individual's connections to countries that are associated with significant terrorist activity."

    "What's the difference between that and targeting people because they are Arab or Muslim?" Cole said, noting that the countries the government focuses on are generally predominantly Arab or Muslim.

    It is the lack of clarity about the rules that has confounded travelers and raised concerns from groups such as the Asian Law Caucus, which said that as a result, their lawyers cannot fully advise people how they may exercise their rights during a border search. The lawsuit says a Freedom of Information Act request was filed with Customs last fall but that no information has been received.

    Kamran Habib, a software engineer with Cisco Systems, has had his laptop and cellphone searched three times in the past year. Once, in San Francisco, an officer "went through every number and text message on my cellphone and took out my SIM card in the back," said Habib, a permanent U.S. resident. "So now, every time I travel, I basically clean out my phone. It's better for me to keep my colleagues and friends safe than to get them on the list as well."

    Udy's company, Radius, organizes business trips for 100,000 travelers a day, from companies around the world. She says her firm supports strong security measures. "Where we get angry is when we don't know what they're for."

February 8, 2008 at 02:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack

TV Mirror — Episode 2: ReflecTVision


Four days ago Episode 1 introduced FrameMyTV, which lets you create a mirrored facade for your flat screen TV.

Now comes a contender.

The big difference?

They supply the TV.


$1,695 and up.

February 8, 2008 at 01:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Best news so far this month


Within a matter of months, a majority of the world's population will be cellphone users.

According to the International Telecommunication Union, a U.N. agency, "At current growth rates, global mobile penetration is expected to reach 50% by early 2008."

This would amount to over 3.3 billion subscriptions.

You could look it up.

Clearly the game is over and the cellphone has won, defeating the PC and now astride the world as the virtual platform of the early 21st century.

Lift-off for global consciousness is now locked in and the countdown has commenced.

Let's get on with it.

February 8, 2008 at 12:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Shinshoku Watch


From the website:

Shinshoku Watch

Shinshoku’s solid, continuous stainless steel band wraps comfortably around your wrist and features a matrix of punched-out holes with twenty-nine super-bright LEDs beneath the surface which illuminate to present the time.


There are two models available — black strap with multicolored LEDs and clear strap with multicolored LEDs.


A single touch of the upper button animates the LEDs, which then cascade across the band presenting the time.

Pressing the lower button skips this animation and presents the time immediately.


Twelve red LEDs indicate the hour; three green LEDs indicate 15, 30 and 45 minutes past the hour; and fourteen yellow LEDs indicate single minutes.

This unique time-telling method makes it easy to see the approximate time quickly, whether it’s quarter past, half past or quarter to the hour, whilst also telling the precise time.


Subtle etched markings on the strap allow you to distinguish easily between hours and minutes — however, with multi-colored LEDs this design is really easy to read, especially at night!

Shinshoku has a strap which is easily self-adjustable to fit your wrist and fits wrist sizes of up to 8.5 inches (225 mm).



[via Jerry Young]

February 8, 2008 at 11:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Are you a recluse? Take the quiz


Nubiana is a 27-year-old self-described "aspiring writer and city-girl recluse from South London" [England].

Among the features on her quirky blog, "The Urban Recluse," is her "Are you a recluse?" quiz.

She writes, "Find out now in this highly unscientific quiz."

Eight easy questions, no tricky nonsense, she'll sort you out in a British minute or Bob's your uncle.

February 8, 2008 at 10:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Briefs Rug


From websites:

Underwear Rug

The Underwear Rug is a cute bathroom rug in the shape of tighty-whities.


Perfect for the little boys room or even the big boys who are little boys at heart!

62cm x 52cm (24" x 20").

Your choice of Red or Yellow stripe.



February 8, 2008 at 09:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

« February 7, 2008 | Main | February 9, 2008 »