« Miōn Bhakti | Home | Half Brolly — Episode 2: Will this appease Flautist? »

May 13, 2008

BehindTheMedspeak: Would you pay extra to have your dental anesthetic wear off in half the time?

Gu7i46787

Novalar Pharmaceuticals is betting lots of people will be happy to add $25-$50 to their bill to cut the time it takes full sensation to return to their lips by 75–85 minutes, in about half the time it would normally take after receiving an injection of local anesthetic prior to undergoing dental work.

Me, I'm old school so I'll pass but I can't see the harm in opting for the additional reversing shot.

Here's Andrew Pollack's article from yesterday's New York Times with the details.

    Drug Promises to Restore Sensation After Dental Visit

    For those who don’t like to drool, slur their speech or unknowingly bite their tongue after a visit to the dentist, help might be at hand.

    A small drug company said it won approval Friday from the Food and Drug Administration to market the first drug meant to undo the effects of local dental anesthesia.

    In clinical trials, the drug cut the median time it took for full sensation to return to the lips by about 75 to 85 minutes, or by more than half.

    The drug, called OraVerse, was developed by Novalar Pharmaceuticals, a privately held company in San Diego. The company said it would begin selling the drug to dentists late this year for $12.50 an injection.

    After a dentist finished a filling or some other procedure, he or she would inject OraVerse into the same spot where the anesthetic had been injected.

    Is a drug really needed for what seems like a trivial use? Novalar and some dentists who advise the company said it might be useful for children, who can injure themselves by biting their lip or tongue without knowing it.

    “Kids tend to chew on their tongue when it’s numb,” said Dr. Athena Papas, a professor at the Tufts University School of Dental Medicine. The drug, however, is not approved for children younger than 6 or weighing less than 33 pounds.

    Dr. Papas, an adviser to Novalar and an investigator in its clinical trials, said she thought the drug would appeal especially to those receiving cosmetic dentistry “who like to look good when they leave the dentist’s office.”

    Novalar said its surveys showed great interest in the product among consumers and among dentists, some of whom said they would mark up the price of the drug as a source of profit.

    With about 300 million anesthesia injections given by dentists each year, company executives say the drug could easily achieve sales of hundreds of millions of dollars a year.

    OraVerse is a formulation of a decades-old drug, phentolamine mesylate, which is used to treat severe episodes of hypertension.

    When dentists administer lidocaine or another local anesthetic, they usually combine it with another drug called epinephrine, which acts to constrict the blood vessels. That keeps the blood from carrying away the anesthetic from the mouth too quickly.

    OraVerse does the opposite, dilating the blood vessels and speeding up blood flow so the anesthetic can be carried away.

    “We aren’t reversing the local anesthesia,” said Dr. Paul A. Moore, chairman of anesthesiology at the University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, who is an adviser to Novalar. “It is reversing the epinephrine.”

    The label for the hypertension drug phentolamine contains warnings about heart attacks and occlusion of blood flow to the brain. Novalar said the label of OraVerse would also contain the warnings, but note that OraVerse is given in a different manner. In the clinical trials there were no serious side effects, Novalar said.

    Novalar also said patients did not have pain because the anesthesia wore off more quickly, except for a little extra pain at the injection site. But the trials excluded people who got root canals or tooth extractions. Those patients would be expected to have lingering pain, and should not get Oraverse, Dr. Moore said.

    In two trials of 484 patients in total, people were given either OraVerse or a sham injection. (Patients were blindfolded so they could not see the needle and, being numb, supposedly could not tell if the needle penetrated.)

    People then tapped their lips every five minutes for five hours, feeling for sensation. Observers measured the symmetry of their smiles, checked for drool and listened to them read sentences.

    About 41 percent of patients who got OraVerse reported normal lower lip sensation one hour after getting the drug, compared with 7 percent of those getting the sham injection. About 59 percent of those who got OraVerse had normal sensation in the upper lip after one hour, compared to 12 percent in the control group.

....................

Note that though OraVerse will cost dentists $12.50 a dose when they buy it, they're free to mark it up as much as they want.

That's why I noted $25–$50 additional on your bill, two to four times what it cost the dentist.

Nice little chunk of change, that: multiplied by, say, 20 injections a week, 80 a month, around 1,000 a year — an extra $25,000 annually isn't chump change where I come from.

May 13, 2008 at 12:01 PM | Permalink


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef00e55220559f8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BehindTheMedspeak: Would you pay extra to have your dental anesthetic wear off in half the time?:

Comments

Oops.
"never-ENDING grinding"
and only one "again", though the doubling seems appropriate.

Posted by: teqjack | May 15, 2008 12:20:45 AM

I might go for it. Heck, I have a tendency to bite my tongue anyway, let alone when I can't tell where it or my jaws are.

But I would kinda like to be completely out during some dental work. The last time I had an extraction done hearing/feeling the never-grinding of tooth vs bone was harrowing, as was the commentary between Doc and Nurse -

"Have to try again again, this thing does not want to come out."

"Look at that root! I haven't seen such a thick one since a sample passed around at school!" (this from a dentist in his early sixties...)

Posted by: teqjack | May 15, 2008 12:17:51 AM

I love it when one professional bad mouths another ones prices they charge. Are dentists allowed to make a profit/living, and what the current market will bear. Its optional, and the patient can request it or not. Some would say an anesthesiologists bill is outlandish for just standing there during the operation most of time, but hey thats just me.

Posted by: drhurt | May 14, 2008 9:33:23 PM

I'M WITH THE FLOOTER! MORE ANESTHESIA NOT LESS!@!!!

Posted by: clifyt | May 13, 2008 8:49:10 PM

I can't imagine wanting it to wear off more quickly. There were times I would've begged for more when feeling came back. "Lingering pain", indeed. Plus, since the drooling and whatnot makes your incapacitation a non-arguable fact, you can always use it for a short while to avoid the odd work/home duties, if you know anyone who is susceptible to that kind of obvious manipulation, which I don't.

Posted by: Flautist | May 13, 2008 3:25:55 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.