« February 15, 2009 | Main | February 17, 2009 »

February 16, 2009

JetLev Flyer

Apply within.

February 16, 2009 at 04:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Verbarius Electronic Clock — 'Tells time the way people do'



From the website:


It has five preloaded languages: English, German, Spanish, French and Russian.

You can easily upload any additional language you like — from Latin to Eskimoan — using the USB port.

The clock spells out time differently every minute: It’s either forty-five minutes past four, or fifteen minutes to five, or four forty-five, or a quarter to five.


Power supply cord, USB connector, CR2032 battery and 512MB SD сard included.

In case of power failure the clock has a backup battery.

Requires a 110/220 V main power supply source.

7.9"W × 2.8"H ×1.7"D (200 × 70 × 42mm).




February 16, 2009 at 03:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Top 9 British Independent Booksellers


 Books2Anywhere (UK, ships US titles from US)

 Paperbackshop (UK, ships US titles from US)

 The Saint Bookstore (UK)

 Fairandfast (UK)

 Farringdon Books (UK)

 Quartermelon (UK)

 ajmbooks (UK)

 Phatpocket Limited (UK)

 Browns Books (UK)


[via Planète Béranger]

February 16, 2009 at 02:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Baby Mop — 'Make your children work for their keep'




[via iManel and kirainet]

February 16, 2009 at 01:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack

'Prize-winning design concept a simple rip-off?'


Above, the headline of Olle Zackrisson's January 14, 2006 Smart Stuff post about the origin of the Cake Cutter featured here last Saturday.

For those not familiar with Sweden-based Smart Stuff , let me note that they consistently feature things gadget- and tech-related not just days, weeks or months but, rather, years ahead of many far more well-known sites.

Here's what Olle had to say three years ago.


Prize-winning design concept a simple rip-off?

The other day we posted a story on the smart cake cutter design concept [A, above] from Mod Design Development in Taiwan. A design that won a Red Dot Design award. This morning we had a disturbing e-mail from Smart Stuff reader Ofer K. who writes:

"About the P'sof cake thing — it really is a great idea, and works wonderfully, and I say this from first-hand experience. But how can that be? It's only a design concept, no? Well, I've had a cutter just like it for the past five years or so, and I even took a picture of it [B, above]. I don't know who made it. I got it here in Israel, but I assume that, like all things plastic, it was probably made in China."

Thank you Ofer, for the mail and for the picture. We suppose none of our readers have any trouble spotting the similarities between Ofer's five-year-old cake cutter (B) and the prize-winning design concept from Mod Design (A). The question is if such a design can be "in the air" as it is sometimes claimed, or if Mod Design submitted (and won an award for) a simple rip-off. I that case not only have we been fooled into crediting the wrong people, but the much respected Red Dot jury has been led to award a prestigious prize on unjust premises. This is sad, not only for the unknown designer of Ofer's cake cutter, but also for every serious designer who works hard to come up with original ideas and solutions. We hope that the last word in this case has not been written.


The reason I featured this ancient (in internet time) history is because it illustrates an everyday dilemma, namely that of whose idea was it?

I've read much on the subject of invention and originality over the years and all that's happened is that I'm now less certain than ever about who deserves credit for something: the person who thought it up and then lost interest, essentially letting it disappear, or the person who discovered it and then took the proverbial ball and ran with it — all the way to the house.

I've always believed that for those who read languages other than English, time spent in the archives can result in astounding [re]discoveries capable of bringing great wealth and fame to any individual able to recognize a breakthrough that died because it was too obscure and/or too early.

February 16, 2009 at 12:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Concrete Tumbler









February 16, 2009 at 11:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack

midomi — 'Search for music using your voice by singing or humming'

, then sing or hum.

"For best results sing or hum as much as you remember. The longer you record the more accurate the results will be."

Can you sing "Far, Far Away?"


February 16, 2009 at 10:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack

What are they?


Answer here this time tomorrow.

February 16, 2009 at 09:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack

« February 15, 2009 | Main | February 17, 2009 »