« Tuna Alarm Clock — Digital Clock-in-a-Can | Home | Jalapeño Ice Cream Mix »

May 15, 2010

No Spanking Map

Savethechildren-1

From Strange Maps:

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Is spanking an acceptable way of disciplining children?

Opinions differ (1). Some consider it barbaric and a definite no-no, others think it merely old-fashioned but quite handy in case of a parenting emergency. A hard core of disgusted disciplinarians protest that the practice’s decline is why today’s youth lacks any respect for authority – and ultimately is one of the main causes for the Decline of Everything.

The ambiguity extends to the legal sphere. Many countries have outlawed corporal punishment in the classroom (2), while only a handful have done the same for parental correction of the physical kind. This map shows those countries on a world map, and amplifies their relatively small number by submerging all other countries (3).

I count 24 countries on this map. So, which are the members of the World Anti-Spanking League?

• On the American continent, only Costa Rica, Venezuela, Chile and Uruguay are visible.

• The entire continents of Africa and Asia have disappeared beneath the waves – the latter with the notable exception of Israel.

• Europe is the main no-spanking continent, with the practice outlawed both in schools and by parents in Spain and Portugal, Germany, the Netherlands and Austria, the Nordic (4) quintet (Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland and Iceland), Latvia, Ukraine, and a remarkably large Balkan delegation: Croatia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria and Greece. Bonus: Cyprus (it’s unclear whether this is only the internationally recognized Greek half of the island, or includes the Turkish north).

• Adrift in the South Pacific, beyond a sunken Australia, New Zealand looks even more forlorn than usual.

Many thanks to Anna Chlebinska for sending in this map, found here on Infographics News. It was produced by Jonas Dagson, described on the site as a "legend of Swedish infographics." The legend reads "Children's Map of the World" in Swedish.

.................................

(1) among adults; children are almost universally against. Two presidential opinions weighing in on the matter: “Don’t hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft!” (Theodore Roosevelt);  ”You do not lead by hitting people over the head — that’s assault, not leadership.” (Dwight D. Eisenhower)

(2) corporal punishment in schools is illegal in almost all European countries (and almost never practiced in the few remaining others). In the US and Australia, it is illegal in some states, but remains legal (if generally rather rare) in others. It is also illegal in Canada, Japan, New Zealand, but also in less ‘liberal’ regimes such as North Korea and China.  It remains legal in large parts of Africa and Asia.

(3) submersion as a method of dramatizing cartographic information is a popular, if controversial method. Previous examples posted in this blog include Wallonie-sur-Mer (#176) and Palestine’s Island Paradise (#270).

(4) "Nordic" or "Scandinavian?" See comments #4, 7 and 9.

May 15, 2010 at 02:01 PM | Permalink


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef01347fe60f5b970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference No Spanking Map:

Comments

One major reason for the gap between classroom rules and home rules is only peripherally related to the act of spanking itself. Many places, including the U.S., place a huge emphasis on the rights of parents, over and against the rights of a government to limit the behavior of parents.

In other words, it takes some quite extreme behavior on the part of a parent before the government should have the right to meddle. Even many people who agree that spanking is barbaric, a sad relic of an ignorant past, still don't support expanding the power of the government to interfere with parents to stop it as a matter of law. Rather, they try to educate and change public opinion over time.

Posted by: Phillip Winn | May 17, 2010 5:50:08 AM

Parenting advice (U.S.) I never understood: "Never spank in anger."

Okay: There's no excuse for totally losing control and whomping a kid, and even the occasional angry swat (guilty as charged) is nothing to be proud of.

But calm, cool, deliberative corporal punishment? As in, "this hurts me more than you"? That's jus' creepy.

Also dumb: "Don't [swat!] hit [smack!] your brother!"

Posted by: Mandy Katz | May 15, 2010 5:40:04 PM

Minor clarification. No, I am not really in favor of allowing schools to utilise physical punishments. But I have seen that in the UK even parents may be brought to court for what I call the first type - I think that should be for the second and third types, not the first.

Posted by: John A | May 15, 2010 3:56:05 PM

The term "spanking" has been used over-broadly. There is a difference between a swat on the rump which stings for one to three seconds and caning which left marks for one to six days - and of course, flogging, which could scar for life or even kill. Most "anti-spanking" advocates do not appear to distinguish among these various corporal punishments, or at best consider the first to be the top of a slippery slope leading directly to the third.

Posted by: John A | May 15, 2010 3:48:54 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.