« BehindTheMedspeak: Mirror, mirror on the wall — got hypertension? | Home | There's something about a Russian build »

October 7, 2010

"Using a Mac could KILL YOUR BABY"

Tee - Cr - Studio6

From Laura Johannes's October 5, 2010 Wall Street Journal story : "For pregnant women, RadiaShield Technologies Inc. ... offers a $59 T-shirt made with silver fibers it says lab tests have found blocks nearly all radiation. Scientists say that metal does reflect and absorb radiation, so the approach seems reasonable."

Not so, says a savage debunking by Lewis Page that appeared in the September 15, 2010 Register, where an accompanying photo bore as a caption the headline up top; his piece follows.


Tee - Black - Studio6

A fearmongering company has this week launched its brand of maternity tinfoil, dubbed "Belly Armor", in San Francisco. The makers of Belly Armor claim that it offers "guaranteed protection" for a pregnant wearer's unborn child from the dangers of "everyday radiation", for instance from mobile phones or computers.

Quite apart from these dangers being baseless claptrap to begin with, in fact there are many types of everyday radiation against which Belly Armor appears to offer no protection: and further, it's worth noting Belly Armor is nothing more than rebranded and seriously overpriced anti-body-odour fabric.

No, really. According to makers RadiaShield Technologies, the fabric in Belly Armor products is "a woven fabric made of 82% silver fiber". The company has hired an independent lab to verify (PDF) that the textile is a barrier to electromagnetic waves in the frequency range 10 MHz to 8 GHz, covering many consumer technologies such as cell phones, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth etc.


CNET news, reporting on the fact that Belly Armor products can now be purchased retail in the Bay Area, quotes CEO Aileen Chen as stating:

"People are expecting the heavy, dentist-office-type aprons but are surprised to find our RadiaShield fabric is lighter than the cotton found in T-shirts."

The unnamed people are evidently not too savvy regarding the electromagnetic spectrum, as the aprons sometimes used by dentists are intended to shield against X-rays - which actually can penetrate the human body easily (that's why they're used for taking pictures of its interior, after all) and inflict ionising damage on it.

Radio and microwave frequencies, by contrast, don't ionise what they hit: the worst they will do to anything is warm it up. They can also be made to dump the generally minute amounts of energy they carry into correctly arranged conductors in the form of tiny electrical currents (that's why we use them to communicate, after all - the conductors being the receiving antennae).


Silver being an excellent conductor, it's no surprise to find that a given silver fibre fabric attentuates signals by more than 40 dB (eg 99.99 per cent) in the frequency range 10 MHz to 8 GHz, with a sharp dropoff at either end suggesting that outside this band the effect disappears.

So you could drape a Belly Armor blanket over your bump and type away on your Wi-Fi laptop or fiddle with your cellphone and baby will receive no emissions from the device. Things behind you or otherwise with un-Belly-Armor'd line-of-sight to the foetus will be unaffected, though! Think of your husband's phone! The Wi-Fi router! The cordless phone base station and handsets! Aiee!


The September 14, 2010 CNET article by Elizabeth Armstrong Moore stated that "pregnant women have the option to take a $59 (T-shirt), $69 (Blanket), or $109 (Luxe Blanket) precaution."

Maybe get all three if you want to be really safe, in a maternity iteration of belt plus suspenders.


Does Linda Lou Turner know about this?

She will.

October 7, 2010 at 09:01 AM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Using a Mac could KILL YOUR BABY":


Thank you Dr. Stirt. Not sure what to say about this other than .....fearmongering for sure.

Posted by: LT | Oct 7, 2010 1:36:16 PM

I'd bet the shirt would confound the "whole body scanners" found at some airports, too.

Posted by: 6.02*10^23 | Oct 7, 2010 11:57:20 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.