« R2D2 Heels | Home | Coleman LED Mini Lantern »

June 4, 2013

BehindTheMedspeak — Dr. Danielle Ofri speaks about the unspeakable: When doctors makes mistakes that kill patients, and how they live with themselves thereafter


I found her brave New York Times Op-Ed page essay remarkable.

I have long carried within me a haunting memory.

Not a single other soul on the planet knows what really happened that day in the late summer of 1974 at Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center, when I was two months or so into my internship and called STAT to a room that housed perhaps 10 or 15 patients (yes, that was how it was there back then).

And no one ever will.

But I digress.

Below, the Times piece.


My Near Miss

It was probably our eighth or ninth admission that day, but my intern and I had given up counting. I was midway through my medical residency, already a master of efficiency. You had to be, or you'd never keep up. This one was a classic eye-roller: a nursing home patient with dementia, sent to the emergency room for an altered mental status. When you were juggling patients with acute heart failure and rampant infections, it was hard to get worked up over a demented nonagenarian who was looking a little more demented.

The trick to surviving was to shuttle patients to another area of the hospital as quickly as possible. This patient was a perfect candidate for the intermediate care unit, a holding station for patients with no active medical issues who were awaiting discharge. First we just had to rule out any treatable medical conditions — get the labs, head CT scan and chest X-ray. But the docs at the intermediate ward left at 5 p.m. and it was 4:45. I quickly scanned through the labs, called the ward's doctor and ran through the case — demented patient, still demented, return to nursing home tomorrow.

I remember the doctor's voice so clearly: "You're sure the labs and everything are normal?" Yes, yes, I said, everything is fine. She hesitated, then said O.K. The intern and I high-fived each other, and bolted back to our other admissions.

The next afternoon the doctor tracked me down. Without mincing words, she told me that she'd been called overnight by the radiologist; the patient’s head CT showed an intracranial bleed. The patient was now with the neurosurgeons, getting the blood drained from inside her skull.

My body turned to stone. An intracranial bleed? You couldn't do much worse than miss an intracranial bleed.

How had I let my craze to decrease my patient load overtake proper medical care? I had failed to check the head CT! I was appalled at myself, mortified by my negligence. I stumbled through the rest of the day, an acrid mix of shame and guilt churning inside me.

I never told anyone about my lapse — not my intern, not my attending physician, certainly not the patient's family. I tried to rationalize it: the radiologist had caught the bleeding, and no additional harm had come to the patient.

But what if I had discharged the patient? What if I had started her on a medication like aspirin that could have worsened the bleeding? My error could easily have led to a fatal outcome. The patient was simply lucky.

In hospital lingo, this was a "near miss." But a near miss is still an error, just one in which backup systems, oversight, or sheer luck prevent harm.

A near miss, like any error, is an opportunity to examine how mistakes are made and what changes might prevent them. Yet we have no idea how many near misses there are. Many experts feel that near-miss errors dwarf the number of known errors, a number that is already too high for comfort. (According to a 2006 report, medication errors alone injure an estimated 1.5 million patients a year.)

But the instinct for most medical professionals is to keep these shameful mistakes to ourselves. For the past two years I've been interviewing doctors about the emotional experiences that have molded them. Though I was interested in the full range of emotions, nearly every single one brought up a medical error that they had been party to during their careers; many of them had never spoken about it before. The shame of their errors — including the near misses — was potent, even decades later.

Much attention has been paid to reducing medical errors. Electronic prescriptions avoid penmanship mistakes. Bar codes on wristbands ensure that medications go to the right patient. Checklists and timeouts before surgeries help prevent common oversights. But we can stop only the errors we know about. There remains a black hole of near misses, of uncharted errors — a black hole of shame that prevents caregivers from coming forward.

Medical culture is less overtly punitive than it used to be, but the guilt and blame are internalized, often savagely, by its practitioners. How can we ease the shame and help doctors and nurses come forward with their near misses?

This is not the type of thing we can orchestrate with a quality-improvement initiative and a zippy slogan. It has to come from inside the medical world, and it helps to start at the top.

When the chief of medicine or the director of nursing stands up and talks about his or her biggest medical error, it will get noticed by the rank and file. Hearing how a person in authority handled the emotional fallout and the feelings of incompetence may give others the courage to come forward. Until we attend to the culture of shame that surrounds medical error, we will be only nipping at the edges of one of the greatest threats to our patients' health.

June 4, 2013 at 12:01 PM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BehindTheMedspeak — Dr. Danielle Ofri speaks about the unspeakable: When doctors makes mistakes that kill patients, and how they live with themselves thereafter:


I'm still pissed off about a proceedure I had done back in November. A few minor complications but the current doctor who had been dealing with them wouldn't even entertain the thought that what he was dealing with wasn't the problem in his text book.

Why? Because when I told him what happened, he called my surgeon and he denied EVERYTHING and told him he couldn't speak to him any more -- even though they are in the same system and I have written authorization.

I pretty much told the second doc what the prob was, what caused it, and that it probably wasn't what he thought. Now on my third doc...he looked into what I said and I was on the money. Just glad I switched doctors before I lost my eyesight.

All could have been prevented by the first doctor acknowledging there was an error. Was it his fault? Would other doctors have ended up with the same result if they had done things the proper way? Given the surgeon's reputation, I think the end result might have happened regardless of who did the job. It isn't like I want to sue him or anything...he fixed a lifelong problem and I'm grateful for it. It just caused a new TEMPORARY one as well...

There has to be a better way if you want to serve your patients.

Then again, I knew a psych intern a few years ago that fraudulently put in insurance so that his clients could be served. Lied to the patients so they could be taken care of without raising suspicion. It is a shame that the other side of working in med field that you can't be honest with patients or you'll get sued, and you can't be honest with the insurance or they will find a way to take care away from the client. If it were me? I'd be on the side of the patient every time...probably why I'm in a research lab instead of hearing people's problems.

Posted by: clifyt | Jun 7, 2013 2:40:08 PM

This topic and its open discussion have been around for a long time.

In my practice, all physicians have read "The High Velocity Edge" and other books to learn to swarm near-misses and put in place systems that make it difficult to make the same mistake.

That said, it is silly and immature to expect that a system run by humans with trillions of medical interactions per year will not have occasional errors. Memory, distraction, emotional upheaval, boredom, and other factors affect your doctor or nurse just as they affect anyone else. Lack of perfection if a symptom of the human condition and not something to be ashamed of. Share best practices; explore errors and near misses; fix situations needing fixing. But we should expect caregivers to do their best, just as we expect of other human beings. It is repugnant to expect them to be ashamed of being nearly perfect.

Posted by: mtbwalt | Jun 7, 2013 12:25:36 PM

I've got it!

We put into place this complex, interactive system of checks and balances where intellect, training, and professionalism rule. Money goes.

Posted by: 6.02*10^23 | Jun 4, 2013 6:47:16 PM

Hopefully, have someone to watch over you when you go to hospital.

If a person is elderly and alone, probably not so possible.

Posted by: Kay | Jun 4, 2013 5:32:12 PM

In a profession where reputation can make or break a career, to think that anyone would willingly throw him or herself on the sword for the "greater good" is wishful thinking.

Posted by: tamra | Jun 4, 2013 3:11:46 PM

GREAT, WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: larry ziegler | Jun 4, 2013 1:18:27 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.