« No More Tears — Johnson's Baby Shampoo has a wonderful new bottle | Home | Cork Remover for Old Wine »

August 28, 2019

Dark matter may be older than the Big Bang

The_History_of_the_Universe

Huh?

I thought nothing came before the Big Bang, and that the question of what preceded it is meaningless. 

From Science Alert:

According to a new paper, the origins of dark matter may be more peculiar than we know.

Perhaps they were particles that appeared in a very brief period of time, just fractions of fractions of a second, before the Big Bang.

This doesn't just suggest a new connection between particle physics and astronomy; if this hypothesis holds, it could indicate a new way to search for the mysterious stuff.

"If dark matter consists of new particles that were born before the Big Bang, they affect the way galaxies are distributed in the sky in a unique way," said astronomer and physicist Tommi Tenkanen of Johns Hopkins University.

"This connection may be used to reveal their identity and draw conclusions about the time before the Big Bang."

It's all tangled up with the order of events at the beginning of the Universe, which in itself is a pretty murky period of time.

We think there was something called the Big Bang — although precisely what that entailed is still being debated.

And we think there was something called cosmic inflation, a very brief period of time — a fraction of a second so small we don't have a name for it — in which the Universe blew up like a balloon.

It is generally accepted that this occurred between around 10-36 and 10-32 seconds after the Big Bang.

That model of inflation looks like the image above.

But some scientists think it happened just before the Big Bang, in which case the Big Bang is the name given to the conditions in the Universe right at the end of inflation.

At this stage we just have no way of knowing.

As Harvard-Smithsonian theoretical physicist Avi Loeb said earlier this year, "the current situation for inflation is that it's such a flexible idea, it cannot be falsified experimentally."

He was talking about whether or not cosmic inflation actually happened (also a matter of debate), but the statement works for the timing of the whoompf, too.

Dark matter — which, according to calculations makes up around 80% of the matter in the Universe — is sometimes considered to be a product of the Big Bang. 

But "if dark matter were truly a remnant of the Big Bang, then in many cases researchers should have seen a direct signal of dark matter in different particle physics experiments already," Tenkanen states.

Instead, his mathematical modeling suggests that dark matter could have been a product of cosmic inflation.

It's not the first time this idea has been proposed, but Tenkanen has provided the math that supports it.

And, if cosmic inflation occurred before the Big Bang, dark matter could have been around before the rest of the stuff in the primordial Universe Soup.

This suggests that scalar particles could lead us to dark matter.

These are particles with a spin of zero, and the inflaton theory — whereby a scalar field drove cosmic inflation — suggests that they were produced in abundance during this eyeblink of time.

So far, we've only ever detected one scalar particle, the Higgs boson.

But that wouldn't be able to tell us much about dark matter in and of itself anyway.

"While this type of dark matter is too elusive to be found in particle experiments, it can reveal its presence in astronomical observations," Tenkanen said.

"We will soon learn more about the origin of dark matter when the Euclid satellite is launched in 2022. It's going to be very exciting to see what it will reveal about dark matter and if its findings can be used to peak into the times before the Big Bang."

The research has been published in Physical Review Letters.

August 28, 2019 at 04:01 PM | Permalink


Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.